If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale.The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. SB has since moved to, does anyone have any background info on this? - MK 11:31, 20 March 2010 (UTC) File:Savita in tution teacher episode.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion Īn image used in this article, File:Savita in tution teacher episode.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status What should I do?ĭon't panic you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). LADave ( talk) 04:23, 21 January 2010 (UTC) I have started a discussion at Talk:Bhabhi. I would have thought a discussion in the talk section should have at least been a preliminary. I'm also curious why you resorted to wholesale deletion. After all, it's mostly quotations from other sources. Perhaps you could help me by identifying which part of my section on "Cultural Context" you decided was "original research". Defender of torch ( talk) 14:45, 4 January 2010 (UTC) OK, I've read WP:SYN. I propose restoring the deleted text and welcome discussion on this point. Rather, balance it with what you think is neutral." If that is not easily possible, and you disagree with a point of view expressed in an article, don't just delete it. "When you find a passage in an article that you find is biased or inaccurate, improve it if you can. While I accept that this article is a controversial area, Wikipedia policy is this: "Defender of Torch" deleted the entire section on 20 December 2009 at 16:58 with no discussion and no explanation except a "NPOV" notation. I contributed a section on "cultural context" because I thought readers coming from outside South Asia would not understand the meaning of the word "bhabhi" in traditional extended families or how the word is sexualized in that context and in the larger culture where extended families are no longer always a given. LADave ( talk) 05:09, 26 November 2009 (UTC) Massive deletions, no explanation Lawrence was widely belittled for writing it. Today there's no question about LCL deserving an article, but D.H.
![savita bhabhi free comics savita bhabhi free comics](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/cc/12/49/cc12493d46a4e03d7bedc47d0afa11a0.jpg)
India may be in roughly the same place that the U.K. If Bollywood puts her in a movie, it will be an earthshaking event! For WP precedents, see Fritz the Cat (film), Heavy Traffic, South Park, The Simpsons, Zap Comix, and even Lady Chatterley's Lover.
![savita bhabhi free comics savita bhabhi free comics](https://img-l3.xnxx-cdn.com/videos/thumbs169lll/30/41/48/304148222acc29c6e23b40d584b4ff0c/304148222acc29c6e23b40d584b4ff0c.6.jpg)
She is already stirring up a lot of discussion. I completely agree that Savita Bhabhi is notable, even though she is fictitious. Regards! Travelsalesman ( talk) -Preceding undated comment was added at 11:05, 19 November 2008 (UTC). I think article has enough notability, anybody may please point out any lapse here. regards, Travelsalesman ( talk) 16:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC) Thanks to admin for talkpage restore, i could get back my Independent ref. Also few refs were deleted in talk page, if any admin could help.
![savita bhabhi free comics savita bhabhi free comics](https://xxxcomics.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/7/5_4pgwy91t8dpzun.jpg)
Travelsalesman ( talk) 16:37, 29 October 2008 (UTC) I have given refs from telegraph, Times of india, ANI etc. I have added enough third party refs to the article. It would be helpful if somebody could explain what exactly need to be done to prove notability.